Thank you for visiting!
I hope to see you there!
Thank you for visiting!
I hope to see you there!
Is there anything we can do as individuals and as a nation to halt this epidemic – or at least lower the stakes for future generations? One step I’d propose is to take a page from European environmental policy, which uses the precautionary principle — an approach to public health that underscores preventing harm to human health before it happens. In June 2007, the European Union implemented legislation known as REACH (the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical Substances). REACH requires chemical and industrial companies to develop safety data on 30,000 chemicals over the next decade, and places responsibility on the chemical industry to demonstrate the safety of their products. By contrast, in the U.S., chemical companies are not required to do any testing to ensure chemicals do not harm the immune system. Chemicals are presumed innocent – unless scientists can prove otherwise, which can take decades and can only be done if there is a source for funding.
It would also be helpful to raise more public awareness about the problem by giving the environmental triggers of autoimmune disease a name. Despite all this mounting evidence, there still exists no word comparable to “carcinogens” in our cultural lexicon to describe the notion that environmental chemicals might be linked to autoimmunity. The term “autogen,” I believe, would prove useful to refer to the toxins, viruses, and every day chemicals we know can play a role in triggering autoimmune disease.
The National Institutes of Health recently stated that investigations of exposures to chemicals as triggers for autoimmune disease are now of “considerable research interest.” That may be true, but they have yet to show researchers the money. With 24 million Americans – and one in nine women – suffering from autoimmunity, the NIH allocates only $591 million dollars for autoimmune disease research each year. Contrast that with the $5 billion annual budget for cancer, which afflicts 9 million Americans. The NIH budget for cardiovascular disease – which affects 22 million Americans – is four times that of autoimmune diseases. We have waited too long for Congress to allocate funding to find out what toxic exposures, or combination of exposures, can cause our immune systems to turn against us. Congress needs to do better.
Some people believe that the sole cause of rising rates of immune-mediated disorders is due to what is called “the hygiene hypothesis.” The hygiene hypothesis holds that the root cause of rising rates of immune related diseases stems not from the fact that we are living in too dirty a world, but, rather, from the fact that we are living too clean. In other words, our lack of exposure to certain viruses and the swill of bacteria that most of our ancestors were exposed to living without vaccines or modern hygiene means children’s immune systems are no longer forced to build up the necessary immune defenses they need. In a world of well-vacuumed homes, scrubbed bathrooms and more time spent in minivans than mucking about through the woods and farmland, coupled with massive vaccination programs that prevent full-fledged infection from many childhood diseases, our immune systems are, in a sense, overprotected. They have so little to react to that they may be overreacting to anything – kind of like a bored teenager who is likely to get in more trouble when they don’t have enough to do.
However, immunotoxicologists at our research institutions agree almost universally that the hygiene hypothesis is hardly enough to fully explain today’s autoimmune epidemic. At the same time that we are living with fewer exposures to natural pathogens, we are coming into contact with many times more artificial invaders in our day-to-day lives. So that at the same time our immune systems may be confronting less natural dirt and muck and deadly outbreaks of disease, we’re encountering an endless slew of artificial toxins that confuse and overtax the immune system. Interestingly, immigrants from other countries who are exposed to numerous infections and have few vaccines as young children develop allergies and autoimmune disease at rates similar to those of Americans soon after they immigrate to this country.
Today, 80,000 chemicals are registered for use in the U.S. and the EPA approves 1,700 more a year – an average of five a day – without any testing as to whether or not they pose a challenge to the immune system. This may well prove to be our next environmental disaster in the making – only this time the frightening changes taking place degree by steady degree are within the invisible, interior landscape of our bodies and not the global climate. As one Johns Hopkins’ researcher put it, we’ve outpaced our evolutionary ability to keep up with the number of toxins we come into contact with everyday. It takes the human body thousands of years to adapt to new environmental stresses – yet in less than a hundred years we’ve dumped so many toxic substances into our environment that our immune system is being asked to differentiate between our own body and unrecognizable foreign invaders non-stop. Which makes our body so much more likely to make mistakes and turn on itself.
Today’s children are the high stakes pawns in this game: pound for pound they eat more food, drink more water, and breathe more air than we adults do, and their immune systems are still developing and vulnerable. It’s as if we are all unwitting participants in an uncontrolled human health experiment as we document how the rising levels of toxins and pollutants in our blood are resulting in climbing rates of autoimmune disease.
There is mounting evidence from occupational studies of the link between environmental toxins and autoimmune disease. In 2007, scientists from the National Institutes of Health announced a new report on exposures to chemicals and death from autoimmune disease. After studying 300,000 death certificates in 26 states over a 14-year period, researchers found that people who worked with pesticides, textiles, hand painting, solvents (such as TCE), benzene, asbestos, and other compounds were significantly more likely to die from an autoimmune disease than people who were not exposed. Other recent studies likewise show links between working with pesticides, TCE solvents, silica, asbestos, PCBs and vinyl chloride and a greater likelihood of developing autoimmune disease.
Ironically, during the decades from 1940 to 1980 — when the medical community believed that autoimmune disease was impossible – the United States was simultaneously engaged in the greatest industrial growth spurt of all time. All across America, production plants were starting to spring up in town after town, as corporations ramped up production of thousands of novel products manufactured through efficient new chemical processes. New pesticides were being introduced to boost crop yields, prolong the shelf life of produce, keep lice, fleas, roaches, and termites out of the home, and zap dandelions from the lawn. Ingenious new chemicals were being used to help manufacture everything we Americans wanted to make our lives easier, simpler and more luxurious – from plastics to hair shampoo, detergents, foam cushions, carpeting, cosmetics, paint strippers, dry cleaning fluids, household cleansers and bleaches, and bigger, grander cars. Almost overnight, Americans began to find themselves inundated with and clamoring for the suburban home products, packaged goods, and manufactured foods churned out by mega-industry. Fleets of trucks transported these newly manufactured goods from coast to coast, and the ChemLawn truck began to circle the cul-de-sacs in neighborhood after neighborhood.
But this coincidence in timing – between a medical community not yet educated about a mysterious, growing set of diseases with an unknown set of triggers and a society’s swell in production of everything from SUVs to Teflon pans to furniture and mattresses that have been stuffed with flame-retardant foam – would turn out to be an ominous one.